Mr Dawood was summoned by NAB to seem before its investigation team on October eight, 2019 in LNG Terminal case. Despite a proper notice by NAB, Engro’s head failed to seem before the investigation team. apparently, NAB failed to follow it up despite his non-appearance.
The anti-graft body is work the LNG terminal case and inactive former minister for fossil oil and natural resources Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, former minister of finance Miftah Ismail and former MD PSO Imranul Haq during this case.News World Ahmed
Despite seventy one days of backbreaking of Shahid Khaqan Abbasi throughout the physical remand, NAB has did not notice a conclusive proof which will implicate him in LNG terminal case because the anti-graft body is finding it tough to file a reference against the previous minister. The bureau has conjointly investigated former minister of finance Miftah Ismail for nearly fifty days however it couldn’t conclude any substantial proof against him either.News World Ahmed
The NAB investigation team is confused what charges ought to it increase file the reference against Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, Miftah Ismail and alternative co-accused. The Bureau’s officers have paid many on-the-scene visits and obtained every and each document from Engro-Vopack yet as from Ministry of fossil oil and Natural Resources however still failing to file the reference against the suspect.
The answerableness Court has sent Mr Abbasi, Miftah Ismail and Imranul Haq on judicial remand on Sept twenty six, however still it's not determined by NAB what charges ought to be levelled against them and once to settle the reference.
However, NAB sources same that a committee has been fashioned to wear down cases associated with traders and notices area unit being sent to involved departments. They same that it had been a unwarranted impression that NAB had softened its policy in reference to flagitious crimes. He same that NAB action is current with none bias.
According to a well-placed supply within the NAB, “The NAB investigation team acting on LNG terminal case still has no plan what to try to to with this case. someday the team focuses on quantum electrodynamics — the advisor company employed by USAID for LNG terminal. someday they asked the ministers why this project of building the terminal was initiated. The NAB team is disquieted that they need found nothing conclusive against the previous ministers yet”.
The NAB’s investigations and its conduct within the LNG terminal case raises several queries. Below area unit few queries, which require to be answered by NAB.
1- The bidding mechanism was same for LNG terminals-I and II. Why did NAB solely investigated the LNG terminal-I.News World Ahmed
2- in keeping with NAB, the govt awarded the contract to Engro-Vopack on higher tolling rates. Did NAB check the record of bidding method to seek out out what percentage firms took half within the bidding? What were the quoted costs of alternative firms if any participated?
3- Shahid Khaqan Abbasi in his answer to NAB form mentioned that 2 firms applied for the contract of LNG Terminal-I. The second company was disqualified on technical basis. it's necessary to notice that the only stage-two envelopes procedure was adopted for LNG terminal-I bidding. If the corporate was disqualified on technical basis, there should be the record of second company’s quoted worth for this contract. Did NAB check the official record to verify what was the quoted worth or tolling rates of second company? If the disqualified company offered lowest bidding rates or its tolling rates were on top of Engro.News World Ahmed
4- Did NAB check the tolling rates and per day capability charges of alternative regional counties’ LNG terminals? If affirmative then what were the tolling rates and per day capability charges of alternative countries’ terminals at that time?
5- once PTI stalwart Asad Umar was business executive of Engro his bid for regasification was around $1.00/mmbtu. Isn’t it strange that NAB is questioning a deal that includes a worth of forty eight cents/mmbtu —almost half the value quoted by Asad Umar?
6- Has NAB found any proof of corruption against the previous minister for fossil oil and natural resources Shahid Khaqan Abbasi or Miftah Ismail et al. because it has obtained all the official documents from Engro yet because the ministry.News World Ahmed
7- What proof of corruption NAB has received from ex-secretary fossil oil Abid Saeed World Health Organization turned authority against Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and others?
8- The NAB officers had summoned Engro’s Chairman Hussain Dawood on October eight, 2019. whether or not he appeared before the NAB authorities or not? If he hasn’t appeared before why NAB failed to arrest him love it did within the case of Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and Miftah Ismail?
9- The NAB in its police blotter against Shahid Khaqan Abbasi alleged that he gave the contract to Engro on steep rates. whether or not has NAB found any conclusive proof that LNG Terminal-1 contract was awarded on steep rates.News World Ahmed
10- The NAB in its police blotter against Shahid Khaqan Abbasi alleged that thanks to undue favor, the national treasury should bear Rs1.54 billion loss as Engro has been given capability charges even in its idle days. Did NAB notice the particular loss incurred to the national treasury thanks to capability charges paid to Engro within the idle days? what percentage days will the terminal stay closed annually? If there's any clause within the agreement for annual maintenance of the terminal? If affirmative what will it say? Is it illegal? Do such clauses associated with plant’s annual maintenance exists in alternative countries? Do such clauses conjointly exist within the agreement between government of Asian nation and IPP? If affirmative then what's the quantum of loss incurred to the national treasury once the IPPs stay closed?
11- What area unit the tolling rates of LNG Terminal-I for the year 2 and onward and what area unit the tolling rates of LNG terminals operative in alternative countries of this region?
12- Did NAB notice any proof of favours given to Engro? What will the contract’s terms and conditions reflect.News World Ahmed
13- Did NAB notice quantum electrodynamics, a advisor appointed by USAID to be concerned in any corruption or giving undue favors to Engro?
14- Why NAB is taking an excessive amount of time to ascertain any wrongdoing in LNG import infrastructure?
15- will NAB blame any non-public capitalist for taking part in any government tender, although government was wrong or had ineligible motives?
16- Why is NAB not work LNG import agreement clauses with Qatar, as this was conjointly negotiated entirely by SKA?
17- If Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, Miftah Ismail and alternative co-accused did corruption within the putting in of the terminal then Engro business firm should have paid them off. Then why is that the owner of Engro Hussain Dawood (cousin of Razak Dawood) not inactive or perhaps questioned by NAB? Why nobody from Engro’s Board is in jail or questioned? Even, Engro’s business executive at that point has not been interrogated. the sole person inactive is that the head of Associate in Nursing Engro Vopack subsidiary that came upon the terminal, ImranUl Haq. will Imran a mere worker pay bribes to ministers yet as Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and Miftah with companies’ prime management’s approval? If not then why is that the prime management of Engro not questioned or interrogated?
18- a minimum of ten members of the board together with the MDs of SSGC, SNGPL, ISGS and extra Secretaries of Finance Associate in Nursingd fossil oil & Natural Resources and representatives of State Life et al. voted for the proposal to permit management to barter putting in place an LNG terminal. Why has NAB not inactive them or questioned them?
19- Miftah Ismail was one in all these ten members World Health Organization voted. the whole negotiations were conducted by MD of inhume State installation (ISGS) and skilled workers from SSGC and USAID foreign consultants and lawyers from Liaqut merchandiser & Associate. Miftah ne'er once attended any negotiations meeting. once more once the negotiated agreement was delivered to the board, the MDs of ISGS and SSGC counseled it yet because the consultants of quantum electrodynamics cluster and Pakistani outside lawyers from Liaquat Merchants & Associates. The board approved the agreement. rather than stunning the opposite member, why NAB has inactive solely Miftah and not the others?
20- Shahid Khaqan Abbasi is that the fifth highest tax money handler of the country whereas Miftah Ismail’s company Ismail Industries last year had sales of Rs30 billion, paid excise tax of Rs5 billion, created a profit of Rs1.5 billion and paid over Rs500 million revenue enhancement. Has NAB found any proof of corruption from these 2 politicians? If affirmative then what proportion cash they received as a payoff from this contract?