That is exactly what happened on Tuesday when an ordinary applicant suspected a definitive extension of Army Chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa's post-soldiery.
It is Riyadh Rahi who challenged General Bajwa's extension of employment and later requested to withdraw the application, but the Chief Justice rejected the request and said that the application was in the public interest under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution. Comes in the category of
See also: Army chief's extension of job notification suspended
This person, Riaz Rahi, challenged the Supreme Court appointment in April 2018 as Justice Qazi Faiz Isa. At this time, the timing and reason for the application against the Army Chief is very important.news world ahmed
As usual, Bajwa was supposed to retire on November 28, 2019. Similarly, the time to file a petition against the appointment of Justice Qazi Faiz Isa to the Supreme Court and to reduce the utility of appointment as Chief Justice Balochistan High Court in August 2009 was an attempt to influence his credibility as a judge. He is considered to be a honest judge in the community.
Justice Qazi Faiz Jesus now faces trials at both the Supreme Judicial Council and the Supreme Court. In March 2018, Riaz Rahey filed two contempt of court petitions against former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.news world ahmed
In December 2013, the Islamabad High Court rejected his petition challenging the special court, which was filed on July 10, 2017, to prosecute former president Pervez Musharraf.
All these requests were rejected. Research shows that Riaz Rahi is a normal judicial applicant. The courts have imposed them at least three times. Justice Shaukat Siddiqui of the Islamabad High Court imposed a fine of Rs one lakh on Riaz Rahi in 2014.
Justice Athar Manullah of Islamabad High Court fined Rs 10,000 for filing irregular petitions challenging the judicial policy and electoral system. Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench Justice Sheikh Hakim Ali sentenced Riaz Rahee to one month imprisonment in a contempt of court in 2005 and fined him Rs 30,000.world wide news,
During the hearing Rahee abused the honorable judge. In March 2010, he challenged the reinstatement of Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Ghulam Rabbani and Justice Khalil-ur-Rahman Ramday, but was subsequently temporarily barred from entering the Supreme Court building.world wide news,
He also filed a petition in the Islamabad High Court against a committee headed by former Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi to investigate the allegations of Member National Assembly Ayesha Gulalai.
The representative tried several times to contact Riyadh Rahi, but he was not available. This is no exception. There are a number of ordinary judicial applicants.
Makhdoom Niaz Revolutionary filed 10 unjustified petitions against politicians, including petitions against Nawaz Sharif.
Justice Athar Manullah of Islamabad High Court imposed a fine of Rs 20,000 on Shahid Orakzai for filing an unrelated plea when he challenged the position of then Chief Justice Lahore High Court Justice Manzoor Ali Shah.
The Supreme Court extended the 5-year ban on admission of Maulvi Iqbal Haider to the Supreme Court.
He was accused of wasting court time with unnecessary petitions. Senior advocate Kamran Murtaza said the petition filed on Tuesday set a new precedent in Pakistan's judicial history.
This is the first application of its kind, there are petitions related to such cases in the High Courts. The timing of filing of this application is very important. Let's see what happens next.
Senior lawyer Babar Sattar tweeted that after the Supreme Court's suspension order, the government and the army chief will have to justify the state of emergency or the nature under which the term of army chief was extended for three years. The Supreme Court's decision is shocking because it was understood that the rules for civil servants do not apply to the Army Chief.
Barrister Zafarullah Khan said the former government had introduced a new law, the "Cast of Litigation Act 2018", which was aimed at preventing unnecessary and unnecessary litigation, in which the loser had to bear all the costs of a competitor. Have to do